Am I the only one enjoying Archie's BLACK HOOD?
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 4:15 pm
I was in my local comic shop several months ago, and the owner approached me as I was checking out. He held out a copy of "Black Hood #1" and told me he was so confident I'd like it that he'd refund the purchase if I didn't. I appreciated that he was making an effort to identify my tastes, although I was fairly certain he'd missed the mark. I thumbed through it, and my initial impression was that it was another "dark and violent for the sake of being dark and violent" title. Still, with a money-back guarantee I had nothing to lose. There was no way I'd have actually returned it had it been repulsive, but I was so impressed the owner's willingness to extend such an offer that I wanted to reward him. (As a friend tells me, I'm a salesperson's fantasy.)
Having never bought a single Archie comic before, whether or not the tone of the book was consistent with "the brand" was a non-issue for me. I was honestly expecting to hate it, and I'll be darned if it wasn't one of my biggest surprises of the year -- and it continues to tell quality stories.
The book is set in modern-day Philadelphia, but it looks and reads as if it could have taken place 30 years ago. Not sure how to classify it, unless "1970's noir" is an actual thing. The city as drawn is dingy, cluttered, and in a general state of decay (physically and morally), oozing with shadows. The artist (whose name I can't recall) has taken great care to make sure that the setting oozes with character, and the same care is taken with the main character, a cop with brutal scars inside and out whose sense of morality is at war with his desire to remove himself from reality as much as his addiction will allow.
It's not the sort of story I've ever been interested in, or would have imagined becoming interested in, and yet somehow the writer has me all in. It's just very well written, from the character's realistic internal monologues to the crisp action sequences. I've never found the violence to be gratuitous, and it consistently avoids most comic book cliches. I've found The Fox much less compelling, and I haven't yet sampled The Shield, but Black Hood has left me wanting more every month.
Is anyone else enjoying this?
Having never bought a single Archie comic before, whether or not the tone of the book was consistent with "the brand" was a non-issue for me. I was honestly expecting to hate it, and I'll be darned if it wasn't one of my biggest surprises of the year -- and it continues to tell quality stories.
The book is set in modern-day Philadelphia, but it looks and reads as if it could have taken place 30 years ago. Not sure how to classify it, unless "1970's noir" is an actual thing. The city as drawn is dingy, cluttered, and in a general state of decay (physically and morally), oozing with shadows. The artist (whose name I can't recall) has taken great care to make sure that the setting oozes with character, and the same care is taken with the main character, a cop with brutal scars inside and out whose sense of morality is at war with his desire to remove himself from reality as much as his addiction will allow.
It's not the sort of story I've ever been interested in, or would have imagined becoming interested in, and yet somehow the writer has me all in. It's just very well written, from the character's realistic internal monologues to the crisp action sequences. I've never found the violence to be gratuitous, and it consistently avoids most comic book cliches. I've found The Fox much less compelling, and I haven't yet sampled The Shield, but Black Hood has left me wanting more every month.
Is anyone else enjoying this?